A fraud.

Authentically enlightened people can’t be committed to their practice, they don’t have to practice. Love isn’t a practice, and love isn’t a commitment either.

What you’re talking about is someone who has been given a glimpse of truth, had a realization, or a shift in their identity, along with the serious commitment to continue their spiritual path to reach the ultimate heights of it, a genuine intention to discover more and more truth and shed more and more lies.

Such commitment is a beautiful thing and that’s what makes further spiritual progress possible, but they shouldn’t be calling themselves “enlightened”. In Buddhist tradition, such people were called “stream-entrants” and other various terms, depending on how deeply embodied their experience is. I prefer to call them “awake” or “self-realized”.

Language isn’t important, these are just words after all, words don’t mean anything, actions do, and the spiritual journey is an experiential one, not a linguistic one. But this underscores the tendency of the ego to pick the highest, most aggrandizing, most revered word it can possibly find and claim it for itself.

The ego is always looking for status, and a spiritual status is also status. It’s very natural, and this was my experience, also.

My advice to such people would be to keep their commitment, but lose their labels!